Blog Search

Poor Huddled Masses

The Fourth of July is perhaps the most fitting day on which to remind everyone that America, as envisioned by the American Revolutionaries and the Bill of Rights, is dead. And, to make matters even worse, it isn’t even inhabited by Americans anymore, as they are no longer the Posterity of the Founders, nor are they truly We the People.

The inability of the vast majority of post-18th century immigrants to adapt to or adopt historical Anglo-Saxon Protestant norms has led to the ruination of the United States culturally and demographically.

For anyone who may to think that immigrants assimilate within a couple or a few generations, it would be wise to consider the generational status of three men responsible for that ruination, Philip Hart, Edward (Ted) Kennedy and, the most significant architect behind the 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act, Emanuel Celler.

Philip Hart – Third-generation Irish immigrant

Emanuel Celler – Third-generation Jewish immigrant

Edward Kennedy – Fourth-generation Irish immigrant

Whereas the American people of 1965 never consented to the alteration of the demographic balance through the elimination of national origins as a consideration for immigration into the United States, decades later almost all Republicans, Democrats, and independents are fully committed to defending the false notion that immigrants and their descendants can stake a rightful claim to the Blessings of Liberty the Founding Fathers’ intended to summarize in the Preamble.

What is more, the Founding Fathers spoke extensively on the intrinsic dangers of immigration and the threat it posed to a free and voluntary republic.

“Resuming the subject of our last paper we proceed to trace still farther, the consequences that must result from a too unqualified admission of foreigners, to an equal participation in our civil, and political rights.

The safety of a republic depends essentially on the energy of a common National sentiment; on a uniformity of principles and habits; on the exemption of the citizens from foreign bias, and prejudice; and on that love of country which will almost invariably be found to be closely connected with birth, education and family.

The opinion advanced in the Notes on Virginia is undoubtedly correct, that foreigners will generally be apt to bring with them attachments to the persons they have left behind; to the country of their nativity, and to its particular customs and manners. They will also entertain opinions on government congenial with those under which they have lived, or if they should be led hither from a preference to ours, how extremely unlikely is it that they will bring with them that temperate love of liberty, so essential to real republicanism? There may as to particular individuals, and at particular times, be occasional exceptions to these remarks, yet such is the general rule. The influx of foreigners must, therefore, tend to produce a heterogeneous compound; to change and corrupt the national spirit; to complicate and confound public opinion; to introduce foreign propensities. In the composition of society, the harmony of the ingredients is all important, and whatever tends to a discordant intermixture must have an injurious tendency.

The United States have already felt the evils of incorporating a large number of foreigners into their national mass; it has served very much to divide the community and to distract our councils, by promoting in different classes different predilections in favor of particular foreign nations, and antipathies against others. It has been often likely to compromit the interests of our own country in favor of another”. -Alexander Hamilton, New York Post

As for today, the reason that current inflation-corrected wages are still below what they were back in 1973, is a) immigration both legal and illegal, and b) the doubling of the number of women in the labor force.

One of the ironies of Independence Day is that most U.S. citizens today are not actual Americans. There are now already 60 million members of La Raza Cósmica resident in the U.S., 45 million more than in 1980. And the vast majority have no more interest in the Constitution, the Rights of Englishmen.

Shift in U.S. Population Diversity

History has taught us that civilization doesn’t tame barbarians, barbarians destroy civilization. And since even the most enthusiastic multiculturalists show no desire of moving to Mexico, there is no doubt that they will all eventually come to accept this reality.

“In the first line of the Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776, Thomas Jefferson speaks of ‘one people’. The Constitution, agreed upon by the Founding Fathers in Philadelphia in 1789, begins with We the people.

And who were these ‘people' exactly?

In Federalist No. 2, John Jay writes of them as ‘one united people … descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in their manners and customs’.

If such are the elements of nationhood and peoplehood, can we still speak of Americans as one nation and one people?

We no longer have the same ancestors. They are of every color and from every country. We do not speak one language, but rather English, Spanish, and a host of others.

We long ago ceased to profess the same religion. We are evangelical Christians, mainstream Protestants, Catholics, Jews, Mormons, Muslims, Hindus and Buddhists, agnostics and atheists”. -Pat Buchanan

Americans did not worry about the massive migration of Mexicans and other third-world immigrants for many years due to their belief in equality and the idea of the American melting pot. Unfortunately, both concepts are complete myths.

For example, nearly 70 million “Americans” would need the Constitution and the Federalist Papers translated into their own language in order to actually read it.

“A record 67.3 million U.S. residents speak a foreign language at home, the latest sign of the growing influence of immigrants on American culture. Census Bureau data shows that homes that do not speak English first grew seven times faster than those that do.

The analysis said, ‘The Center for Immigration Studies finds that 67.3 million residents in the United States now speak a language other than English at home, a number equal to the entire population of France. The number has nearly tripled since 1980, and more than doubled since 1990. The growth at the state level is even more pronounced. All language figures in Census Bureau data are for persons five years of age and older’”. -Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner

Conservatives were unable to even preserve the English language in the United States. To be a conservative in today’s America means to deny that an American national interest exists. It means to be opposed to the very idea that an American nation even exists except as “a proposition” to which one may assent. It means to be a nominal international equalitarian.

What we are witnessing is the intellectual and human capital decline of the U.S.A. in real-time. The supposed demographic saviors are simply not as capable as the Americans they have been brought in to replace.