News writers have thrown a tirade over a community's opposition to child molesting and presenting grotesqueries in front of students for the sake of sex education.
"Last year, when the state board of education proposed new sex-education standards for teaching about issues such as sexual orientation, gender identity and consent, a retired pediatrician in this central Nebraska town reached out to Gov. Pete Ricketts and state lawmakers.
'This is NOT Sex Ed as anyone knows it', Sue Greenwald wrote in a July 16, 2021, email obtained by The Washington Post. Lessons that met these standards, she wrote, would be ‘grooming children to be sexual victims'.
 |
| Retired pediatrician Sue Greenwald speaks in opposition to the Nebraska Department of Education's proposed new sex education curriculum |
It was a shocking claim, and it was catching on — repeated by Greenwald, by members of the Protect Nebraska Children Coalition, a group she co-founded to oppose the standards, and embraced by Ricketts (R) himself. The message also spread through screenings at libraries and churches of 'The Mind Polluters,' billed as an 'investigative documentary' that 'shows how the vast majority of America’s public schools are prematurely sexualizing children.'
Grooming erupted as a national issue earlier this year, but this state in America’s heartland has been roiled by that attack on comprehensive sex education since last spring, providing a unique window into a newly inflamed debate. The unsubstantiated claim helped activate an army of self-described Nebraska patriots who rose up against the standards, took over the local Republican Party and propelled a wave of far-right candidates for local and statewide school boards, a Post examination found. Earlier this month, these activists were part of a broader, anti-establishment insurgency that toppled leaders of the state Republican Party.
The term 'groomer' has become a catchall epithet hurled by the right wing against the left, particularly against advocates for LGBT people, who have become the target of a recent surge in violent threats and attacks. The Post’s examination focused on the specific claim that modern sex education — including lessons on sexual orientation and gender identity — makes children more vulnerable to pedophiles.
Greenwald and others who have endorsed that claim acknowledged to The Post that there is no scientific body of research that shows such lessons make children more likely to be victimized". -Beth Reinhard and Emma Brown, Washington Post
The reason there is "no scientific body of research" on the subject is that science cannot possibly apply here.
The rationale against showing children sexually explicit images and discussing adult themes with them does not necessitate any scientific support.
Besides, there is no question that such lessons increase the likelihood of children being victimized considering that those instructing the children are themselves acting as victimizers.
What most parents innocently believed was nothing more than the basics of the birds and the bees was actually a lewd, pornographic spectacle designed to sexually indoctrinate their children.
The only way in which these depraved miscreants disguised as "educators" could possibly sink to lower depths would involve a millstone wrapped around each of their necks and a deep ravine.