The foreign ministers of NATO member states are set to announce their willingness to invite Ukraine into the bloc.
“There is a consensus within NATO that Ukraine needs to become a member of the bloc, Ukrainian Minister for Euro-Atlantic Integration Olga Stefanishina claimed on Thursday. Budapest’s objections to Kiev’s participation – due to a dispute over ethnic Hungarians living in Ukraine – will be overcome by ‘political instruments’, she added.
 |
| Ukrainian Minister for European and Euro-Atlantic Integrations, Olga Stefanishina |
A number of the U.S.-led military bloc’s most prominent members, including France and Germany, are known to have reservations about allowing Ukraine to join. Furthermore, Kiev’s territorial disputes with Russia are thought to render it ineligible under the Organization’s current rules.
‘We have made progress on the question of getting closer to NATO’, Stefanishina said at a security forum in Kiev. ‘At the most recent ministerial summit in Bucharest, all 30 member states agreed on the need to offer Ukraine membership’.
Western media reports from the Bucharest event were broadly at variance with Stefanishina’s interpretation. Meanwhile, the bloc’s own website placed a larger emphasis on China in its wrap from the summit.
‘NATO members confirmed that the alliance door is open to Ukraine’, she insisted, arguing that the alleged consensus was a ‘new powerful signal’ that shows ‘no one fears pressure from Russia’.
Hungary continues to object to Ukraine’s participation in NATO’s official meetings, but this has ‘become a problem’ for the bloc, the minister told her audience in Kiev. NATO is now using ‘all political instruments of pressure to convince Hungary to abandon the blockade’, the minister said.
She did not elaborate on the form that such pressure might take. On Wednesday, the EU announced it would withhold billions in funding to Hungary until it complies with 27 ‘essential milestones’ laid out by Brussels. The money includes pandemic relief and ‘cohesion’ funds intended to level social inequalities in the bloc.
Hungary certainly appeared skeptical towards Ukraine’s membership in NATO at the Bucharest summit, with Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto arguing that a country could only join the bloc if it ‘does not threaten but strengthens the security of existing members’.
Szijjarto has also reiterated that Budapest would ‘not agree to a formal meeting of the NATO-Ukraine Commission until the Hungarians of Transcarpathia have their rights restored’.
‘We cannot and do not want to retreat from this position’, he added, explaining that while Budapest has not raised the issue since the conflict in Ukraine escalated in February, it has not forgotten about it either”. -RT
If Russia had never conducted its special military operation, Ukraine would have likely been fast-tracked in acceptance to NATO membership, which means that not only would Ukraine be on a path toward nuclear capability, but NATO warships would be sitting in the Black Sea and Sea of Azov ports.
Russia had no choice but to enter Ukraine as the threat to Russia was existential. One can’t help but wonder whether it’s been the Russian strategy from the onset to stalemate Ukraine from joining NATO.
Although Jens Stoltenberg has already announced that NATO would keep its open-door policy towards Ukraine and Georgia, the situation does not appear to be any more promising for the Intergovernmental military alliance of Western states than it does for Kiev in particular.