Germany’s Minister for Foreign Affairs Annalena Baerbock has put together a platform for “feminist foreign policy” that will infuse “gender issues” into everything from humanitarian aid and energy to climate change.
“Green Party leader Annalena Baerbock has put together a platform for ‘feminist foreign policy’, several outlets reported on Tuesday. The revamp of Berlin’s diplomacy, due to be made public later this week, will infuse ‘gender issues’ into everything from humanitarian aid and energy to climate change.
‘We are pursuing a feminist foreign policy because it is bitterly necessary. Because men and women are still not equal worldwide’, Baerbock wrote.
The 80-page report outlines 10 principal guidelines, according to the German news agency DPA. Among them are offering ‘gender-sensitive’ humanitarian aid, involving ‘women and marginalized groups’ in economic development and considering the ‘gender issues’ dimension of climate and energy policies.
The measures are intended to ‘shape our inner workings and help us to form a feminist reflex’, Baerbock reportedly wrote, arguing that one of the foreign ministry’s goals should be to ‘measurably advance gender equality worldwide’. She also wants to create a new post of ‘ambassador for feminist foreign policy’.
By her definition, however, feminism policy is not just for women, but also for those ‘marginalized by society on the basis of gender identity, origin, religion, age, disability, sexual orientation or other reasons’.
Therefore, in addition to spending 85% of project funds in a ‘gender-sensitive’ manner, the Foreign Ministry intends to spend another 8% in a ‘gender-transformative’ way that ‘actively challenges gender norms’ by the end of the legislative cycle”. -RT
The intrinsic arbitrariness of equal rights advocacy is once again on full display.
Despite supposedly offering a means of improvement, equalitarian doctor invariably inflicts societal devastation wherever it gets implemented.
For all its pretenses about choice, equal rights advocates have not done the majority of men or women any favors by denigrating the desires of family-oriented, traditional societies by eliminating homemaking as a choice simply because women are inclined to choose it.
It’s very straightforward as to why “civilized” egalitarian societies like Germany are on the decline and their continued existence imperiled. Fewer women are getting married, and they’re having far fewer children. So much so that without mass migration, the native birthrate would be at a sub-replacement rate.
Why any people in any part of the world would wish to adopt an ideology that leaves its women barren and the burden of civilization lying solely upon its men is anyone’s guess.
Perhaps it’s the European feminists’ ingrained cultural exceptionalism and ethnocentrism that allows them to reconcile their doctrinarian attempts at destroying Dar al-Islam by pushing secularized Western education on Islamic women with their otherwise liberal, broad-minded sensitivities.
In any event, no matter how hard pedantic feminists like Baerbock might try, “gender equality” cannot exist in Germany or anywhere abroad because, while the concept of gender equality is nothing more than a utopian ideal, the detrimental societal consequences of the fictitious sexual egalitarian dogma are not only perceivable but, both men and women from traditionalists backgrounds have already caught on to the fact.