The psychological operation behind the COVID-19 pandemic has been substantiated through the leaked texts of the former British Secretary of Health and Social Care from December of 2020.
“Matt Hancock, the UK's former Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, spoke about wanting to ’deploy’ a new strain of COVID in order to ’frighten the pants off’ people so they would comply with lockdown mandates in December 2020, leaked texts revealed on Saturday.
As part of the reporting on the Lockdown Files — over 100,000 WhatsApp messages sent between British public health officials and ministers that were leaked to The Telegraph — the outlet revealed the disturbing texts that ’show how the government used scare tactics to force compliance and push through lockdowns’.
In one December 13th exchange, Damon Poole, a media adviser to Hancock, told the health secretary that Tory members of parliament were ’furious already about the prospect’ of more stringent mandates, and suggested that they could ’roll pitch with the new strain’.
Hancock responded, ’We frighten the pants off everyone with the new strain’.
His adviser concurred, with Poole replying, ’Yep that's what will get proper bahviour [sic] change’.
’When do we deploy the new variant’, Hancock then asked.
This conversation took place just two days after Hancock was made aware of the ’alpha’ variant of COVID, which led to the ’effective cancellation of Christmas on December 19th’, according to the publication.
In another suspicious message from Cabinet Secretary Simon Case, he said that ’the fear/guilt factor’ was ’vital’ for ’ramping up the messaging’ when lockdown mandates had swept the nation in January 2021.
Just a month after Hancock suggested the launch of a new COVID variant to scare people into compliance, he and Case discussed mandating ’more mask wearing’ including ’in all settings outside home’.
Back in June of 2020, as the UK was emerging from its first national lockdown wave, Hancock and Sir Patrick Vallance, the government's Chief Scientific Adviser, expressed their appeasement that a study suggesting that COVID was beginning to go in a ’positive direction’ had not been widely publicized, while a more ’gloomy’ survey gained more popularity in the media.
’If we want people to behave themselves maybe that's no bad thing’, wrote Hancock of the conflicting reports.
Sir Patrick appeared to agree, with, ’Suck up their miserable interpretation and over deliver’.
The more hopeful study, the outlet reported, was the Real-time Assessment of Community Transmission (React) study from Imperial College London, which showed that the reproduction rate of COVID had declined. However, it was a study from Cambridge University in conjunction with the UK's public health agency which showed higher transmission rates in portions of the country, which was used to heighten the public's fears.
Four months later, in October 2020, Poole wrote in a WhatsApp group chat about his idea to stop publishing a COVID watchlist by area, so that everyone would feel fear across the country rather than specific regions.
’It helps the narrative that things are really bad if we don't publish’, he said”. -Olivia Rondeau, Human Events
A spokesman for Mr. Hancock stated, “There’s nothing new in these messages, and absolutely no public interest in publishing them given the independent inquiry has them all. It’s highly intrusive, completely inappropriate, and has all been discussed endlessly before”.
While the corporate media is doing its utmost to portray the revelations as nothing more than a source of uproar and division amongst the Tories, the reveling admission by the former British Health Secretary that the government’s intentions were to peddle disinformation in order to soak fear throughout the public has not escaped the scrutiny of the average observer.