Turkey’s presidential and parliamentary elections, taking place on Sunday, could either stretch President Recep Tayyip Erdogan's rule into a third decade or could set the country on a new course.
“Is Turkey in for a change of power and a change in its foreign policy course? What would this mean for Russia and for the world at large?
Three politicians are running for president: the current leader, 69-year-old Erdogan from The People’s Alliance, 74-year-old Kilicdaroglu who represents opposition force The Nation Alliance, and Sinan Ogan, a 55-year-old candidate from ATA Alliance.
If none of the candidates wins over 50% of the vote on Sunday, a run-off will be held on May 28th. Most opinion polls suggest this is highly likely.
The main battle is between Erdogan and Kilicdaroglu, who represents a grouping of six opposition parties. However, it is nearly impossible to predict a victory for either candidate based on opinion polls since the Turkish public does not have a clear-cut favorite.
ADA predicts an Erdogan victory in the first round, with 50.6% of the vote, and estimates his opponent Kilicdaroglu will receive 44.8%. Konda Research sees things differently, predicting 43.7% of the vote for Erdogan and 49.3% for the opposition leader. Media polls predict similar outcomes – a survey by the Hürriyet newspaper predicts victory for Erdogan while the newspaper Duvar favors The Nation Alliance's man. The only thing that everyone agrees on is that Ogan will struggle to collect more than 5% of the vote.
While Erdogan’s chances of winning the presidential elections are considered high, the parliamentary elections look quite different – the Justice and Development Party is likely to lose its majority.
According to an opinion poll by Motto and Bulgu Research, 34.2% support the president’s party, while 33% back the Republican People's Party – the country’s largest opposition faction. A total of 32 parties and five alliances will be represented on ballot papers.
Over recent years, Turkey’s diplomatic weight has significantly grown. Not only neighboring countries but also other world powers are now obliged to take Ankara’s views into account, Gajiyev notes.
Thanks to its role as practically the only mediator to have responded to the global food crisis – having facilitated the grain deal – Turkey has gained significant advantages and now openly declares that ‘the world is bigger than five’, the expert added. This refers to the five permanent members of the UN Security Council – a situation which, as Erdogan often claims, does not reflect today's global reality.
‘Turkey aims to take part in the global governance system on such a globally high level. This has mostly become possible because of the Russia-Ukraine conflict and Turkey’s role in it’, said Gajiyev.
He also noted that Turkey has become a powerful regional transit hub – not only in terms of energy, but also food, transport, and logistics. This means that it receives huge cash transfers, privileges, and dividends.
However, many do not celebrate the fact that Turkey is growing stronger, especially considering the personality of its current leader. Over the past year, Erdogan’s intractability became manifest in the admission of NATO members – Ankara is the main opponent to Sweden's accession to the bloc and has accused Stockholm of supporting terrorism.
For this reason, experts surmise that the West hopes for an opposition victory in Turkey.
‘Kilicdaroglu is more pro-Western than the other candidates’, said Viktor Nadein-Rayevsky, senior researcher at the Institute of World Economy and International Relations in Moscow. He notes that the opposition party intends to return to Atatürkist ideology, which is based on the outlook of the modern country's founder Mustafa Kemal Atatürk.
‘The Atatürkists are focused on relations with the West. These ideas, largely abandoned by Erdogan, are now being revived’, the expert said.
Russian International Affairs Council expert Kirill Semenov agrees. He believes that if Kilicdaroglu wins the election, ‘[he] will work more actively with European states, including NATO, and will share the general views of the alliance’.
‘Sweden will join NATO anyway, it's just a matter of time. Though, perhaps, if Erdogan wins, he may again try to delay this process for personal reasons – for example, because the West and NATO actively supported Kilicdaroglu. Erdogan may try to recoup and put up some obstacles’, Semenov said.
‘In any case, Kilicdaroglu’s victory will be beneficial for NATO, since Erdogan's independent foreign policy, especially within the alliance, is not shared by everyone – definitely not by the opposition’, said Nadein-Rayevsky.
Since Turkey is currently the only NATO state that can hold a full-fledged dialogue with Russia, the outcome of the elections will also influence Moscow's discourse with the bloc's members, according to Gajiyev.
If Erdogan wins, Turkey’s relations with Russia, including energy and military cooperation, will remain a priority. Nadein-Rayevsky believes this is Erdogan’s great advantage. However, a victory by the pro-Western opposition would not mean an instant decline in relations between Ankara and Moscow, since giving up all the perks that Turkey receives from its relations with Russia would be ‘at the very least huge foolishness in regard to foreign policy’ Gajiyev points out.
‘I don’t think even the opposition would do that, not to mention Erdogan. It seems to me that Russian-Ukrainian relations won’t take any sharp turns, especially if Erdogan stays in power’, the expert said.
As of now, the opposition also speaks from a pro-Russian perspective. In its election manifesto in January, The Nation Alliance promised to strengthen ties with Russia through balanced and constructive dialogue at the institutional level.
‘We will foster relations with Russia at the institutional, not leadership level as it is happening now under Erdogan and the Justice and Development Party. We will maintain relations at the level of institutions and the Foreign Ministry’, Unal Cevikoz, the party’s deputy chairman for foreign relations, told RIA Novosti.
He noted that regarding relations with Moscow, the opposition will take into account both the long-standing historical relations between the two countries, and Turkey’s NATO membership. He also noted that Ankara will continue being a mediator between Russia and Ukraine.
Addressing an expert meeting in Moscow, Kilicdaroglu named the end of the Ukrainian conflict and the continuation of the grain deal as his priority if he wins on May 14th. He also noted that healthy relations with Russia are in the interests of Turkey.
‘I would like to comment on media reports saying that Turkish-Russian relations will take a different course during my presidency and the coming to power of The Nation Alliance. Our government will always defend the interests of Turkey. And it is in Türkiye’s interests to keep Turkish-Russian relations healthy and dignified’, he said.
Kilicdaroglu’s statements indicate that he does not approve of anti-Russian views. ‘How will our government develop Turkish-Russian relations? With predictability, dignity, and respect’, Kilicdaroglu said.
He described cooperation between Turkey and Russia as an essential part of regional stability and expressed confidence that the two countries will be able to strengthen and develop cooperation in many areas, especially in the fight against terrorism.
The opposition candidate also recalled the Russian Su-24 fighter jet which Turkey shot down in 2015, and the shocking murder of Russian Ambassador Andrey Karlov in Ankara in 2016. As Kilicdaroglu noted, these events demonstrate the fragile state of Turkish-Russian relations, which are prone to crises because the current Turkish administration ‘is guided by personal interests, and ignores principles and institutions’.
‘Turkey poor leadership and unpredictability also negatively affect economic relations between us. Even with the volume of our trade reaching $70 billion, there is a significant deficit that is detrimental to our country. It is quite possible to change this and stabilize our economic relations by finding a mutually beneficial balance’, Kilicdaroglu said.
As Semenov noted in a conversation with RT, the opposition candidate’s pro-Western course does not mean that the Russian-Turkish agreements concluded under Erdogan will be undone.
‘This cooperation is beneficial for Turkey and in some aspects it will certainly be preserved. But stricter measures may also be imposed. For example, Turkey may provide more military aid to Kiev and may heed those who want it to cease being a hub for evading anti-Russian sanctions. But Ankara itself isn’t likely to impose sanctions against Russia, even if Kilicdaroglu comes to power’, the expert said”. -RT
The Western-backed 74-year-old opposition candidate Kemal Kilicdaroglu, who met publicly with United States Ambassador to Turkey Jeff Flake back in April, had accused the Kremlin of “interfering” in the Turkish electoral campaign.
And, while the opposition leader claimed to have had substantiating evidence of Russian meddling, such supposed proof is yet to be presented.
Besides the fact that a Kilicdaroglu victory by no means guarantees an outright alignment of Turkish foreign policies with Western demands, Kilicdaroglu has run against Erdogan in the past three times and lost on every occasion.